Thanks Leif, I had changed it to res_timing_dahdi and since last few days it seem good.
-S > Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 15:48:03 -0400 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] res_timing_timerfd.so Vs res_timing_dahdi.so > > On 11-05-13 11:39 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > I haven't tried with timerfd but with timer pthread 1.8 is very unstable > > > > I think I have seen a post to the list from kevin fleming that the same is > > for timerfd that there is a nasty bug which they haven't found the reason > > for yet > > My experience is that you should pretty much always use res_timing_dahdi > unless > you're on a platform on which you can't install DAHDI. You don't need any > hardware to use timing from DAHDI because timing is generated by the kernel. > > My order of preference for stability is: > > * res_timing_dahdi > * res_timing_timerfd > * res_timing pthread > > The timerfd and pthread modules are relatively new, and sometimes people run > into stability problems while using them. If you can use res_timing_dahdi I > recommend you do so. > > Leif. > > -- > _____________________________________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: > http://www.asterisk.org/hello > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
