On Tuesday 24 May 2011, jon pounder wrote: > On 05/24/2011 11:35 AM, A J Stiles wrote: > > > Someone asked about the quality of it, he was quoting the hardware specs > of a similar device.
No they didn't. The "original message" to which the spammer was pretending to reply (and in the wrong place, even) never existed in the first place. > I doubt magicjack publishes that kind of detail about theirs. > > so where is the problem ? Its irrelevant he represents that device > commercially. The problem is that it is a blatant advertisement, not-very-cunningly disguised as a legitimate response to a question. This is known as tag-team spamming (or at least, it is when someone actually pretends to post a question). -- AJS Answers come *after* questions. -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
