On 3 June 2011 22:41, Hans Witvliet <h...@a-domani.nl> wrote: > On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 09:07 +0100, Ishfaq Malik wrote: > > Are you suggesting that there are no bugs in 1.4 or 1.6? > > I presume that you are aware of the fact that it is impossible to prove > the absence of "bugs" in any piece of software.... > You might not have detected them yet. > Furthermore behaviour that might have been coded on purpose, can be > considered "eroneously" some time later. > > > Currently there seems to be a fear of 1.8. We're about to put it into > > production and yes, we've had issues with it, mostly due to the fact we > > use RealTime, but before you change anything it is always advisable to > > test the hell out of it. > > > > To anyone who is thinking of moving to 1.8 the question is not, 'is it > > stable?'. The question is, 'have I comprehensively tested it to show > > that it is suitable for my needs?' > > If you put it into production, test at least the functions that you are > going to use. There might (and probably will) problems in the code, but > as long as it does not bother you, so what? > >
See this thread here about Asterisk 1.8 - and Digium's view on the matter. http://nerdvittles.com/?p=743
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
