On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Adrian Abramovich < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > We are using asterisk 1.4 and we use a Perl script to record some specific > calls. As far, everything is working well. > I was thinking about create a module in order to improve script's > performance. > I checked the Russell's blog: > > http://www.russellbryant.net/blog/2008/06/19/how-to-write-an-asterisk-module-part-1/ > This is a old post and I would like to know if there are something new. > What I do, is look at the other apps/funcs for guidance. Pick the smallest first, and you can copy their style and layout. The module spec has evolved from 1.4 to 1.6 to 1.8, but it's the same basics (to a degree). > Is it a good idea to move to module? > If it increases performance, and you need that, then heck yes! The only drawback is that it *is* in the source; you'll have to tweak it as you move up the versions. You have to compile and install it. Perl would remain static (I would imagine) even when you update asterisk. > Thanks in advance, > > Adrian Abramovich > > > > > -- > _____________________________________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: > http://www.asterisk.org/hello > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > -- Steve Murphy ParseTree Corporation 57 Lane 17 Cody, WY 82414 ✉ [email protected] ☎ 307-899-5535
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
