Yes, something like that, but hold"-state should not answer channel. answer command will be given explicitly. or call can be transfered to Dial command, etc.
2011/10/5 Sammy Govind <[email protected]>: > Can you please explain what you are trying to do? What I've perceived from > this thread is that you want to put call on hold (passively as in no > resources usage) and then on the base of some User's input from UI proceed > with the call accordingly !! > -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
