On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 09:31:30PM +0100, Philipp von Klitzing wrote: > > Why exactly would hylafax be a "worst case" solution only, why would you > tink that that the Asterisk solution is better at all?
The "worst case" would be the modem hairpinned into an FXS port, not hylafax per se. > > Instead of a fax machine, the people could have a scanner > > Hmpf... I've always found that to be a very bad replacement for an analog > fax, at least as soon as you have to deal with more than 1 page. Plain > old analog fax machines are a very well designed devices... I suppose you're right. Perhaps one of those unified printer-copier-scanner things might be better, but the models that will take multiple input pages start getting expensive. I guess it depends whether the people are doing more print-to-fax sort of things or feeding the fax machine with large amounts of paper... -w -- /~\ The ASCII Ribbon Campaign \ / No HTML/RTF in email X No Word docs in email / \ Respect for open standards _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
