On 12/18/2011 06:43 AM, Andreas Sikkema wrote:
On 12/18/11 12:55 AM, William Scott wrote:
Notice there is no "rtpmap:18 G729/8000" in the reply.
The call continues fine.
Is it right that there is no codec info in the reply and the call continues?
The value for 18 is defined in some RFC as being G729/8000 so there's no
real need to redefine it in the SDP, especially not since the answering
party already knows that the initiating party also uses the same value.
Unless the offeror has reassigned 18 to a different payload type, which
is technically allowed but a terrible idea, so you likely won't ever see
it in practice :-)
--
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber: [email protected] | SIP: [email protected] | Skype: kpfleming
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
