On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 15:31 +0100, Johan Wilfer wrote: > > For the next server I will research will further, and test out lxc to > see if it can replace openvz. I found some posts to this mailinglist > about lxc that seems to indicate that it works well, and the methods > are quite similar to openvz. >
+1 for LXC. Has been running flawlessly for me (about a dozen instances on a single modest machine) for about six months now, on Ubuntu (server) 11.04 - asterisk 1.4.x and FreePBX. I have a "parent" asterisk running on the "host" that handles call routing for the containers. Documentation is almost nil, and some of the tools are flaky - while I was getting the template perfected I had a few instances of "stuck" containers in a weird state which required manual removal of files in /cgroup. I've often wondered if I jumped into LXC too soon, but now that the template is stable and I'm not constantly mucking with it, it has been maintenance-free (knock on wood). See the archives for my posts about getting dahdi to run (for timing conferences) in the containers. Cheers, j -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
