1.8 and 11 forward all seem to have a timeline of around 5 years. 10 only runs for two. Since the code is available that isn't a biggie to me, but the appearance of a "short life" could cause some customer discomfort.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 5:13 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Proposed changes to Asterisk release and support cycles On 01/31/2012 04:07 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: > Why the "short life" on Asterisk 10? Can you rephrase your question? This proposal does not change the planned lifetime of Asterisk 10 at all. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies Jabber: [email protected] | SIP: [email protected] | Skype: kpfleming 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
