On Sun, 5 Feb 2012, Josh wrote:
I am a bit baffled though - Asterisk has existed for quite a while now
and I am not sure why this wasn't implemented sooner - everyone knows
that using 0.0.0.0 is a security risk.
Why do you see binding to 0.0.0.0 to be a security risk?
If you only have 1 interface, what's the difference?
If you have 2 interfaces, just bind to one or the other.
If you have 3 or more interfaces (or you need to just bind to some
subset), you should have the skills to configure 'iptables.'
Unfortunately, (IIRC) Asterisk does not reply to the same interface
packets are received from which limits the usefulness of multiple
interfaces.
--
Thanks in advance,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Edwards [email protected] Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST
Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
