Le 09/02/2012 09:49, Administrator TOOTAI a écrit :
Le 08/02/2012 23:28, Kevin P. Fleming a écrit :
On 02/08/2012 04:02 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote:
Not a complaint, per se, just a question. Why are the LTS versions
"odd"
(11, 13, 15, etc) and the non-LTS (10, 12, etc) even? As I read
the chart,
Digium/Asterisk is committing to a new LTS version every 2 years?
Well, the first LTS was Asterisk 1.4 (although we didn't call it an
LTS then). The second LTS was Asterisk 1.8. The third would be
Asterisk 11. It's just a quirk of the version numbering scheme.
The proposal is that yes, we'd be committing to producing an LTS
every 2 years, and a standard release in the intervening years.
I agree with Danny. To get thinks back to odd, why not skip the
Asterisk 11 version and go straight to 12 for next LTS? Such behavior
was already done by going from 1.8 to 10, so one more ... ;-)
To clarify, odd for development, even for LTS.
--
Daniel
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
