Jonas Kellens wrote:
"it might work"...
Without labbing things up with your exact scenario Jonathan can't confirm it. I did a quick search of the issue tracker for anything open similar to the issue you specified and nothing came up. The functionality you are using is commonly used so either it's something specific to how you are using it or was an issue in the version you are using and is not in recent versions.
As well - if the log you provided has not been altered then you are attempting to add an interface "member3" to the queue. While this will succeed it is ultimately not a valid interface and would not be considered as available. This would explain why it does not work.
How come app_queue is suddenly so unstable ?
I don't quite know what you are referring to here. There are issues but it is in use by many companies and works for them, within the confines of what it can do.
Which version has a stable app_queue ?
You'd have to be specific in what you mean by "stable".
I thought unstable versions are released with "rc-" added ?
rc stands for release candidate. It is not inherently unstable, it's just a candidate for release put out there for testing. It helps to uncover issues.
-- Joshua Colp Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
