A qualify value that low would be a resource hog (some phones can't even re-register in 10 seconds). The Nagios solution would require a custom shell, so it would less needy to make the shell be a daemon independent of either.
-----Original Message----- From: Eric Wieling [mailto:ewiel...@nyigc.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 4:12 PM To: ch...@acsdi.com; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion; Danny Nicholas Cc: Benny Amorsen Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Capture queue agent drop and put caller back in queue Using qualify=10 ? -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Harrington Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 5:11 PM To: Danny Nicholas Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion; Benny Amorsen Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Capture queue agent drop and put caller back in queue How do you propose that Asterisk determines that the endpoint has vanished off the network without waiting for a 10-90 second timeout period? On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Danny Nicholas <da...@debsinc.com> wrote: Not doubting how quickly Nagios can respond, but if the Nagios solution is going to place a call using Asterisk, wouldn’t it be just as efficient (or more so) to depend on Asterisk? -- -Chris Harrington ACSDi Office: 763.559.5800 Mobile Phone: 612.326.4248 -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users