On 06/10/2013 11:53 AM, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:33:16AM -0400, Dave Fullerton wrote:
Not sure how I should officially report this...
You should feel free to open issues at http://issues.asterisk.org.
but I'm getting a compile error with DAHDI-linux 2.7 when I define
CONFIG_DAHDI_NET in include/dahdi/dahdi_config.h. I am able to
compile successfully when I leave it undefined, but I need to be
able to use the network support.
<snipped>
/oct6100_api/oct6100_tsst.o
AR /tmp/dahdi-linux-2.7.0-net/drivers/dahdi/oct612x/lib.a
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 0 modules
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-3.4.45'
make -C /lib/modules/3.4.45-smp/build
SUBDIRS=/tmp/dahdi-linux-2.7.0-net/drivers/dahdi
DAHDI_INCLUDE=/tmp/dahdi-linux-2.7.0-net/include
DAHDI_MODULES_EXTRA=" " HOTPLUG_FIRMWARE=yes modules
DAHDI_BUILD_ALL=m
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-3.4.45'
CC [M] /tmp/dahdi-linux-2.7.0-net/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-base.o
/tmp/dahdi-linux-2.7.0-net/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-base.c: In function
'dahdi_net_open':
/tmp/dahdi-linux-2.7.0-net/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-base.c:1967:4: error:
'struct dahdi_chan' has no member named 'rxbufpolicy'
make[2]: *** [/tmp/dahdi-linux-2.7.0-net/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-base.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [_module_/tmp/dahdi-linux-2.7.0-net/drivers/dahdi] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-3.4.45'
make: *** [modules] Error 2
Thanks for reporting this.
I have a patch [1] for the next release. If you are willing, care to
apply it to your 2.7.0 tree and check it out?
If you are building from a tarball you can easily apply it like:
$ curl
"http://git.asterisk.org/gitweb/?p=team/sruffell/dahdi-linux.git;a=patch;h=e4d89ffa7485";
| patch -p1
[1]
http://git.asterisk.org/gitweb/?p=team/sruffell/dahdi-linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=e4d89ffa7485
Cheers,
Shaun
Thank you Shaun, that patch did the trick. DAHDI compiled and appears to
be functioning normally.
I wondered if I might impose upon you for a question. I am in the
process of replacing an old router with a T1 interface with a Linux
machine. My test rig is currently using a spare TE220F. I know digium's
card were primarily designed to function in a telephony role, but is
there any technical reason I should not use them in an exclusively data
role as well? I am trying to decide if I should purchase another TE220F
(which I have experience with) or use a Sangoma product (which I do not).
Thank you for your time.
--
Dave
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
