On Aug 30, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Asterisk Development Team <[email protected]> wrote:
> * The Asterisk RESTful Interface (ARI) has been added. This interface lets > external systems harness the telephony primitives within Asterisk to develop > their own communications applications. Communication with Asterisk is done > through a REST interface, while asynchronous events from Asterisk are > encoded in JSON and sent via a WebSocket. More information on ARI can be > found > at https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/x/lYBbAQ > > * Major standardization of the Asterisk Manager Interface and its events have > occurred within this version. In particular, the names of Asterisk channels > no longer change and are stable throughout the lifetime of the channel. > More information on the changes in AMI can be seen in the AMI 1.4 > Specification at https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/x/dAFRAQ I've been looking occasionally at how 12 work was going and I'm curious about how AMI and ARI relate. Do they effectively expose the same functionality, just offering a different style of communication? Or is there be a reason to prefer one over the other beyond the protocols used?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
