Hi,
I have some servers that are dedicated to do meetme conferencing. From
some previous test i concluded that I need to use dahdi_dummy as it is
more accurate.
If I did use the core timers in dahdi (not loading dahdi_dummy) I got
bad quality in the conferences and dahdi_test showed 99.6% as worst.
I thought maybe the issue as bad hardware for the timing or something
else. But today I re-ran these tests on another server showing the same
thing.
- Can anybody comment on why DAHDI with core timers drop down to 99.6%
occasionally?
- Is a hardware-card for timing the most efficient way to get timing
even if I just use the card for the timing?
Below is some stats (trimmed, but you get the idea).
Thanks!
/Johan
** With Dahdi 2.7.0.1, and core timers:
99.998% 99.611% 99.615% 99.997% 99.993% 99.997% 99.996% 99.608%
99.999% 99.612% 99.607% 99.613% 99.999% 99.998% 99.994% 99.609%
--- Results after 177 passes ---
Best: 100.000% -- Worst: 99.604% -- Average: 99.901099%
Cummulative Accuracy (not per pass): 99.998
** With Dahdi 2.7.0.1, and dahdi_dummy loaded:
99.993% 99.998% 99.998% 99.993% 99.996% 99.998% 99.996% 99.998%
99.998% 99.997% 99.999% 99.998% 99.996% 99.998% 99.999% 99.997%
--- Results after 177 passes ---
Best: 100.000% -- Worst: 99.993% -- Average: 99.997738%
Cummulative Accuracy (not per pass): 99.998
** With Dahdi 2.7.0.1, and Wildcard TE220 providing timing
99.981% 99.983% 99.983% 99.982% 99.983% 99.982% 99.984% 99.981%
99.982% 99.983% 99.984% 99.981% 99.980% 99.984% 99.983% 99.983%
--- Results after 177 passes ---
Best: 99.996% -- Worst: 99.974% -- Average: 99.982104%
Cummulative Accuracy (not per pass): 99.982
Kernel: 2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
