IPSec VPN is what we use. The biggest issue is QoS. I do not see any other inexpensive solution.
-Vladimir On 12/4/2013 12:10 PM, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote: > Have seen mostly a lot of hq/branch implementations using IPSEC over > standard Internet connections.. that's what seems most cost effective > for most smb's, imo, with the inherent trade-offs. Other than that, > I'd say private IP VPN's based on HDSL E1's. > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:48 PM, er ic <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Just wanted to get a feel for people in the community. > > I researched a lot of information but I wanted to know the > communities perspective on this and didnt want to revive a dead > thread: > > Any pros/cons for connection to asterisk boxes located at > different sites via an IP-VPN or Frame Relay? > > I wanted to know the best cost effective way to connect the two > remote boxes other than the Internet. > > Thanks in advanced! > > -E > > -- > _____________________________________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: > http://www.asterisk.org/hello > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
