On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Olivier <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > How does extensions.lua compares to extensions.conf or extensions.ael on > stability, performance and features ? > > Would you recommand extensions.lua as an easy/easier way to access > memcached, redis or equivalent ? > > Thoughs ? Comments ? > The lack of replies should give you your answer. Extensions AEL and LUA don't get much action these days, I'm sure there are a few people that use them but extensions.conf has way more code coverage from a testing POV.
Your better off using AGI if you want to leverage redis or memcached. -- Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc. Jabber: [email protected] | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Github: https://github.com/pabelanger | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pabelanger -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
