Thomas Rechberger wrote:
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20841
The patch was already posted by someone but then was deleted because of
guide lines. Is it really that hard to fix? Since 1.8 there is this
problem but nobody seems to care about. Asterisk isnt only used with
itsp who dont care about fromdomain. Or are the developers saying, we
dont care about people who are using Asterisk in smaller installations?
It's hard in the sense that someone has to figure out in chan_sip how to
fix it, do so, get it tested, and also confirm it doesn't cause any
regressions. Simply committing something isn't enough. I'd rather not
break chan_sip in some other way. ^_^ Nobody has yet done this.
That being said... this specific issue was brought up to me by a friend
and I was actually going to look at it over an upcoming weekend when I
have time. Can I guarantee it? No, but I'm going to try. That's how much
I care. Can I do this for every issue? No. I work 8+ hours a day as it
is on Asterisk and also some on the weekends. So many issues, not enough
time. ^_^
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
