On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Steve Edwards <[email protected]> wrote: > I've got some Asterisk 11 (I could 'upgrade' if needed) hosts using meetme > and I'd like to switch to confbridge to service more callers. > > Can anyone reply with their experience along the lines of 'using meetme I > was only getting x callers per server but with confbridge I now get y > callers per server?' >
Anecdotally, when ConfBridge was first rewritten in Asterisk 10, some performance comparisons with MeetMe were performed. In the best case, on a particular system with conference user usage patterns, we saw MeetMe hit a limit at around 60 channels, and ConfBridge reach over 240 channels. Worst case for ConfBridge was around 140 channels. Note that the ConfBridge sample rate, mixing interval, and other parameters can greatly affect how far it scales out. -- Matthew Jordan Digium, Inc. | Director of Technology 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
