Richard Kenner wrote:
I'm getting a SIGSEGV at ast_slinear_saturated_multiply at the line:

351             res = (int) *input * *value;

It's called from ast_frame_adjust_volume.

The frame looks like:

(gdb) print *f $6 = {frametype = AST_FRAME_VOICE, subclass = {integer
= 100021, format = { id = AST_FORMAT_SLINEAR16, fattr = {format_attr
= { 0<repeats 64 times>}, rtp_marker_bit = 0 '\000'}}}, datalen = 0,
samples = 320, mallocd = 1, mallocd_hdr_len = 1076, offset = 64, src
= 0x51623b0 "func_jitterbuffer interpolation", data = {ptr = 0x0,
uint32 = 0, pad = "\000\000\000\000\000\000\000"}, delivery = {
tv_sec = 1436290187, tv_usec = 304285}, frame_list = {next = 0x0},
flags = 0, ts = 0, len = 0, seqno = 0}

so datalen is 0 and samples nonzero.  ast_frame_adjust_volume,
however, iterates over samples, not datalen.  Is that correct?

What does it mean to have a packet with a zero datalen anyway?

This is an interpolated frame from func_jitterbuffer. It's part of packet loss concealment. What scenario exposed this?

--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org

--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
              http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to