On Sun, Dec 16, 2018, at 4:43 AM, Michael Maier wrote: <snip>
> > Another question: is there any use case for 183 Session Progress w/o > SDP? IOW: Is a 183 Session > Progress just a bug of the ISP? If so, problem could be solved by > dropping each 183 package w/o SDP. Nothing really comes to mind that would be accomplished by sending a 183 without SDP but there may be cases on the internet. -- Joshua C. Colp Digium - A Sangoma Company | Senior Software Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/ New to Asterisk? Start here: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
