I am looking to install a web interface for Asterisk to transfer calls and look who's on the phone. If anybody has a working web interface please let me know. I installed the www.asternic.com (operator) But when I bring up my web browser it says transferring data and does not bring a browser.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 5:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #3408 - 12 msgs Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: G.723 (Eric Wieling) 2. RE: G.723 (Steven Critchfield) 3. Re: Voicemail storage in DB (James H. Cloos Jr.) 4. Voicemail config from database (AJ Grinnell) 5. oob to inband dtmf over rtp (James H. Cloos Jr.) 6. OT appologies to list (Linus Surguy) 7. Re: OT appologies to list (Brian Cuthie) 8. Zapateller issues (Mark Phillips) 9. RE: Zapateller issues (Sean Cheesman) 10. RE: Zapateller issues (Darrin Johnson) 11. Re: Re: Voicemail storage in DB (James H. Thompson) 12. Re[2]: [Asterisk-Users] OT appologies to list (Stephen Karrington) --__--__-- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:08:06 -0500 From: Eric Wieling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G.723 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Todd Wallace wrote: > Is it at all possible? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 12:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G.723 > > Todd Wallace wrote: > >>Is there an easy/cheap way to add g.723 to Asterisk? I have added >>g.729 and need g.723. > > > No. Once you pay the G723, patent holders their money I'm pretty sure the unoptimized ITU sample code for the G723.1 codec can be added to Asterisk pretty easily. But since it's not optimized don't expect to be able to send many G723.1 calls thru Asterisk if you are transcoding. Of course, if you are NOT transcoing, then this whole thread is moot since Asterisk already supports G723.1 passtthru. See this message in the mailing list archives: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2003-August/001317.html You can also pay the $30 or so to the ITU to get a copy of the G723.1 specification and sample source code for the codec, but that does not license you to use the codec, you still need to license it from the patent holders. This issue has been discusse before. You didn't find this information when you searched the Asterisk mailing list archives? --Eric --__--__-- Message: 2 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] G.723 From: Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:16:34 -0500 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 12:47, Todd Wallace wrote: > Is it at all possible? Technically it is possible, financially/legally it isn't. Search the archives for exact problems with patent holders in the technology and why they won't talk to you for less than a huge stack of bills. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 12:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G.723 > > Todd Wallace wrote: > > Is there an easy/cheap way to add g.723 to Asterisk? I have added > > g.729 and need g.723. > > No. -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --__--__-- Message: 3 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "James H. Cloos Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 14:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Voicemail storage in DB Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> "WipeOut" == WipeOut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: WipeOut> Have you thought of mounting the spool directolr on an NFS WipeOut> file server ... [I am] not sure if there would be any file WipeOut> locking issues.. Yes, there would be. This is the same issue as using nfs mail spools with maildir style storage. W/o locking there is no way to guarantee that two servers do not create the same vm file on top of one another. The best bet for the OP is to write support for storing the files into the sql db. I'd suggest using two tables: one will have the metadata (timestamp, to, from, a seq id, et al) and the 2nd would have an index that is the seq id from the 2st table & a blob that contains the audio data. Separating them like that provides for better optimization by the dbm, whether that is mysql, pgsql (my preference), ibmdb2, firebird, oracle or whatever. I'd extimate the code would take just a few hours to write and debug. Surely less than a coder-week. -JimC -- James H. Cloos, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://jhcloos.com> --__--__-- Message: 4 From: "AJ Grinnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 14:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail config from database Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any help with this will be greatly appreciated. When re-compiling * to include voicemail access from a MySQL database, I recieve the follwing error. Anybody know how I can fix this? Am I missing packages somewhere? app_voicemail.c:44:25: mysql/mysql.h: No such file or directory In file included from app_voicemail.c:247: mysql-vm-routines.h:7: parse error before '*' token mysql-vm-routines.h:7: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `dbhandler' mysql-vm-routines.h:7: warning: data definition has no type or storage class mysql-vm-routines.h: In function `mysql_login': mysql-vm-routines.h:18: warning: implicit declaration of function `mysql_init' mysql-vm-routines.h:18: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast mysql-vm-routines.h:19: warning: implicit declaration of function `mysql_real_connect' mysql-vm-routines.h: In function `mysql_logout': mysql-vm-routines.h:29: warning: implicit declaration of function `mysql_close' mysql-vm-routines.h: In function `find_user': mysql-vm-routines.h:35: `MYSQL_RES' undeclared (first use in this function) mysql-vm-routines.h:35: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once mysql-vm-routines.h:35: for each function it appears in.) mysql-vm-routines.h:35: `result' undeclared (first use in this function) mysql-vm-routines.h:36: `MYSQL_ROW' undeclared (first use in this function) mysql-vm-routines.h:36: parse error before "rowval" mysql-vm-routines.h:37: `MYSQL_FIELD' undeclared (first use in this function) mysql-vm-routines.h:37: `fields' undeclared (first use in this function) mysql-vm-routines.h:69: warning: implicit declaration of function `mysql_query' mysql-vm-routines.h:70: warning: implicit declaration of function `mysql_store_result' mysql-vm-routines.h:71: `rowval' undeclared (first use in this function) mysql-vm-routines.h:71: warning: implicit declaration of function `mysql_fetch_row' mysql-vm-routines.h:72: warning: implicit declaration of function `mysql_num_fields' mysql-vm-routines.h:73: warning: implicit declaration of function `mysql_fetch_fields' mysql-vm-routines.h:90: warning: implicit declaration of function `mysql_free_result' make[1]: *** [app_voicemail.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk/apps' make: *** [subdirs] Error 1 AJ Grinnell Network Operations Technician CRT/ Arialink Broadband 1223 Turner Street, Suite A Lansing, MI 48906 517.346.5041 517.492.1321 direct --__--__-- Message: 5 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "James H. Cloos Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 14:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] oob to inband dtmf over rtp Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are there any known problems converting dtmf from oob over iax2 to inband over rtp/ulaw? Obviously it works when converting to inband over pri/ulaw et al, but how about rtp? I've got packet traces that confirm that 2833 packets are properly generated when I have 2833 configured for the rtp link, but the other side seems to be ignoring those packets. So I tried inband on that link; nothing was able to recognize my dtmf there either. I have to presume that either oob->inband is broken for -> rtp or it is broken w/o a zap timing source.... -JimC -- James H. Cloos, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://jhcloos.com> --__--__-- Message: 6 From: "Linus Surguy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:30:40 +0100 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] OT appologies to list Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [I'm sorry to trouble the list with this, but this is the only way I know to contact the person concerned] This message is for Stephen Karrington - it appears that you have over-agressive 'spam' filters and we can no longer email you. Please rectify this if we are to have meaningful conversation! The original message was received from Linus Surguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- This message has been blocked by our spam filter. ----- ----- If this has been a mistake, please contact ----- ----- the recipient through other means. ----- Undelivered message for: <"Stephen Karrington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> (reason: 550 Spam blocked) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 550 Spam blocked >>>> DATA >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 12 15:23:04 2004 Received: from idoru.world.co.uk (idoru.world.co.uk [213.166.5.65]) by sky.dreamtime.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3CJN3Ve093074 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:23:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from news.world.co.uk (office-gw.magrathea-systems.co.uk [213.162.109.118]) by idoru.world.co.uk (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i3CJMwc15379 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:58 +0100 Received: from molly (molly.world.co.uk [10.0.0.2]) by news.world.co.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with SMTP id i3CJMtDk006598 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:55 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Linus Surguy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Stephen Karrington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Re[4]: [Asterisk-Users] Who has access numbers in the UK and Germany? Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:59 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 --__--__-- Message: 7 Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:42:27 -0400 From: Brian Cuthie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT appologies to list Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] There's more than a little irony here, given that one of their products is called "Email Blaster." -brian Linus Surguy wrote: >[I'm sorry to trouble the list with this, but this is the only way I know to >contact the person concerned] > >This message is for Stephen Karrington - it appears that you have >over-agressive 'spam' filters and we can no longer email you. Please rectify >this if we are to have meaningful conversation! > >The original message was received >from Linus Surguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ----- This message has been blocked by our spam filter. ----- > ----- If this has been a mistake, please contact ----- > ----- the recipient through other means. ----- > >Undelivered message for: <"Stephen Karrington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > (reason: 550 Spam blocked) > >----- Transcript of session follows ----- >550 Spam blocked > > > >>>>>DATA >>>>> >>>>> >>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 12 15:23:04 2004 >Received: from idoru.world.co.uk (idoru.world.co.uk [213.166.5.65]) >by sky.dreamtime.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3CJN3Ve093074 >for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:23:04 -0400 (EDT) >Received: from news.world.co.uk (office-gw.magrathea-systems.co.uk >[213.162.109.118]) >by idoru.world.co.uk (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i3CJMwc15379 >for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:58 +0100 >Received: from molly (molly.world.co.uk [10.0.0.2]) >by news.world.co.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with SMTP id i3CJMtDk006598 >for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:55 +0100 >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >From: "Linus Surguy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Stephen Karrington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Re[4]: [Asterisk-Users] Who has access numbers in the UK and >Germany? >Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:59 +0100 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; >charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >X-Priority: 3 >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 > >_______________________________________________ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > --__--__-- Message: 8 Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:47:28 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mark Phillips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Zapateller issues Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi All, In theory if I do this; exten => s,1,Zapateller(nocallerid) exten => s,2,Privacymanager exten => s,3,Dial(a bunch of SIP extensions) My callers should only hear the anti-telemarketing tones if they call from a line that has no caller*ID and then get offered an opportunity to enter it, right? What I'm finding is that in the event of no CID the caller gets dumped into the Privacymanager which then passes the call onto the next step regardless of their input of details. At no time do I hear the tones. I tried, exten => s,1,Zapateller(answer|nocallerid) exten => s,2,Privacymanager exten => s,3,Dial(a bunch of SIP extensions) But then every call was answered regardless of CID and the tones were heard. Any ideas? G7LTT/KC2ENI Mark Phillips --__--__-- Message: 9 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Zapateller issues Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 14:54:58 -0500 From: "Sean Cheesman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If I remember correctly (and I could be wrong) I think you have to answer the line first... exten =3D> s,1,Answer exten =3D> s,2,Zapateller(nocallerid) exten =3D> s,3,Privacymanager exten =3D> s,4,Dial(a bunch of SIP extensions) > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 2:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Zapateller issues >=20 >=20 > Hi All, >=20 > In theory if I do this; >=20 > exten =3D> s,1,Zapateller(nocallerid) > exten =3D> s,2,Privacymanager > exten =3D> s,3,Dial(a bunch of SIP extensions) >=20 > My callers should only hear the anti-telemarketing tones if=20 > they call from a line that has no caller*ID and then get=20 > offered an opportunity to enter it, right? >=20 > What I'm finding is that in the event of no CID the caller=20 > gets dumped into the Privacymanager which then passes the=20 > call onto the next step regardless of their input of=20 > details. At no time do I hear the tones. >=20 > I tried, >=20 > exten =3D> s,1,Zapateller(answer|nocallerid) > exten =3D> s,2,Privacymanager > exten =3D> s,3,Dial(a bunch of SIP extensions) >=20 > But then every call was answered regardless of CID and the=20 > tones were heard. >=20 > Any ideas? >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > G7LTT/KC2ENI > Mark Phillips > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/aster> isk-users > To=20 > UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > =20 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users --__--__-- Message: 10 From: "Darrin Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Zapateller issues Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 12:59:03 -0700 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or you could specify the answer in the Zapateller line like: ... exten => s,2,Zapateller(answer|nocallerid) .... -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Cheesman Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 12:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Zapateller issues If I remember correctly (and I could be wrong) I think you have to answer the line first... exten => s,1,Answer exten => s,2,Zapateller(nocallerid) exten => s,3,Privacymanager exten => s,4,Dial(a bunch of SIP extensions) > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 2:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Zapateller issues > > > Hi All, > > In theory if I do this; > > exten => s,1,Zapateller(nocallerid) > exten => s,2,Privacymanager > exten => s,3,Dial(a bunch of SIP extensions) > > My callers should only hear the anti-telemarketing tones if > they call from a line that has no caller*ID and then get > offered an opportunity to enter it, right? > > What I'm finding is that in the event of no CID the caller > gets dumped into the Privacymanager which then passes the > call onto the next step regardless of their input of > details. At no time do I hear the tones. > > I tried, > > exten => s,1,Zapateller(answer|nocallerid) > exten => s,2,Privacymanager > exten => s,3,Dial(a bunch of SIP extensions) > > But then every call was answered regardless of CID and the > tones were heard. > > Any ideas? > > > > > G7LTT/KC2ENI > Mark Phillips > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/aster> isk-users > To > UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users --__--__-- Message: 11 From: "James H. Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Voicemail storage in DB Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 09:58:12 -1000 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> "WipeOut" == WipeOut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > WipeOut> Have you thought of mounting the spool directolr on an NFS > WipeOut> file server ... [I am] not sure if there would be any file > WipeOut> locking issues.. > > Yes, there would be. This is the same issue as using nfs mail spools > with maildir style storage. W/o locking there is no way to guarantee > that two servers do not create the same vm file on top of one another. You could use NFS with the Maildir alogrithm or something similar to avoid the need for locking. --__--__-- Message: 12 Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 22:18:42 +0200 From: Stephen Karrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Dreamtime.net Inc. To: Brian Cuthie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re[2]: [Asterisk-Users] OT appologies to list Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, Email Blaster is spam proof and permission only. Its just the name that gets people excited :) Sincerely, Stephen Karrington Dreamtime.net Inc. http://www.dreamtime.net http://www.emailblaster.us Corporate Office 101 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Voice - 877-203-9308 Fax - 310-943-2606 Dreamtime is your global choice for worldwide communication services, viral marketing software and direct sales channel automation. ===8<==============Original message text=============== There's more than a little irony here, given that one of their products is called "Email Blaster." -brian Linus Surguy wrote: >[I'm sorry to trouble the list with this, but this is the only way I know to >contact the person concerned] > >This message is for Stephen Karrington - it appears that you have >over-agressive 'spam' filters and we can no longer email you. Please rectify >this if we are to have meaningful conversation! > >The original message was received >from Linus Surguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ----- This message has been blocked by our spam filter. ----- > ----- If this has been a mistake, please contact ----- > ----- the recipient through other means. ----- > >Undelivered message for: <"Stephen Karrington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > (reason: 550 Spam blocked) > >----- Transcript of session follows ----- >550 Spam blocked > > > >>>>>DATA >>>>> >>>>> >>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 12 15:23:04 2004 >Received: from idoru.world.co.uk (idoru.world.co.uk [213.166.5.65]) >by sky.dreamtime.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3CJN3Ve093074 >for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:23:04 -0400 (EDT) >Received: from news.world.co.uk (office-gw.magrathea-systems.co.uk >[213.162.109.118]) >by idoru.world.co.uk (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i3CJMwc15379 >for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:58 +0100 >Received: from molly (molly.world.co.uk [10.0.0.2]) >by news.world.co.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with SMTP id i3CJMtDk006598 >for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:55 +0100 >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >From: "Linus Surguy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Stephen Karrington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Re[4]: [Asterisk-Users] Who has access numbers in the UK and >Germany? >Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:59 +0100 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; >charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >X-Priority: 3 >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 > >_______________________________________________ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ===8<===========End of original message text=========== --__--__-- _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users End of Asterisk-Users Digest _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
