Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Wake up. > Sorry, I must have drifted off for a while. Thanks for the alarm call.
> > The reversal detection is a complete waste of time. Totally unnecessary. > Pointless. A line break detector would have much more use, as it would > give a reliable disconnect detection on many lines. (Actually, reversal > detection would have years ago, but its not much use any more). > Perhaps both would be good then: A polarity reversal detector for determining the start of a Caller*ID sequence and a line break detector for, err, detecting line breaks. Actually, my X101P seems to detect hangups just fine, so I've not had cause to check whether the detection is done in the hardware or in the driver. If you say that it's not done in hardware then I'll take your word for it for the moment. > > All you need for these CLI requirements is to monitor for some energy on > the line. Since these FXOs are not being used in banks of hundreds, you > will never notice this MIPs this uses. > I'd still prefer to see this done in hardware, rather than in some sort of idle loop in the driver or the application. Call me old fashioned, but I prefer it when unnecessary overheads are not measured in MIPs. :-) Perhaps the new FXO module for the TDMxxB has, or will have, hardware support for the above. If it has, and I'm sure I heard somewhere that it does, then that's great. An X102P, with similar support, would no doubt be welcome too. -- _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
