Steven Critchfield wrote:
On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 12:39, Michael Sandee wrote:It did as "generic communications device".
The bus isn't wrong... debian is wrong. Like everything in debian... it ships with an old pci.ids
(No flames intended... but still :P )
If that was all, then it would have still showed up in the PCI bus just
like you mention below.
Well... tell me what is unstable about putting a new pci chip identification database into your distro?It also means he is probably running the "STABLE" version. Debian named it stable only because they don't change it very often. If you want something as new as the other distros, you have to go with "Testing", or "Unstable", possibly even "Experimental". Just be glad they properly mark their releases unlike others whose x.0 releases shouldn't ever be trusted in a production environment.
(Not flaming either, just filling in the picture)
I run debian stable on my workstation... Some things are ok to be stable... but things like this are...well not so nice.
I seriously advice against that... vividly remebering the NPTL debacle in unstable... and loads of other glibc problems you can read about in the bugtracker.Same should work with an upgrade in debian.replace yours with one from: http://pciids.sourceforge.net/
And It *should* report it better... (Didn't verify)
Agreed. But that wasn't my point ;)Not that any of this matters... Just load the driver and get on with it.
While this may be true, the kernel should probably be recompiled for best performance on the new hardware.
While we are at the subject anyway I can put some on-topic info here aswell. Recent benchmarks with 6 QuadBRI's on a Pentium-4 2.8Ghz resulted in a almost 100% improvement in load under Linux 2.6(.4) over Linux 2.4(.25). This ofcourse resulted in less (no) quirks in the sound under 2.6 than under 2.4.
The loadtest was done looping the BRI's to each other and in such way that we used all 24 BRI's (2 channels) resulting in 48 active channels.
http://voidptr.astmaster.org/loadtest1.jpg http://voidptr.astmaster.org/loadtest2.jpg
The audio quality was easily monitored in contrary to often proposed "test suites"... Two phones at each end...
Regards
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
