I commented the two lines in rtp.c, took 20 seconds, rebuilt the source, and off we go. Fixes the iax issue just fine.
I think the rtp.c 'hack' is the way to go. Bad 'ole 'hack'. Just my 2c. - Chris Netlabz, Inc. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ray Burkholder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:13 AM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] AArgh, * and the 7960 > Quoting brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > You're missing the point, Brian. Those comments were in response to your > > > statement that essentially said there isn't a problem because your system > > > is working fine. And based on your comment, your primary (only?) iax link > > > is to Nufone. > > > > No I'm getting it loud and clear. You have some IAX providers that do not > > want to take care of customers when the software they use to provide service > > to their customers needs an update they refuse or fail to upgrade. Not our > > problem if they choose not to. If they update to cvs-head the problem will > > go away and its backwards compatible with cvs-stable. You can continue to > > hack rtp.c or ask your providers to upgrade. If they refuse to take care of > > you then I would consider getting service elsewhere. > > > But as I've mentioned before, this isn't the whole story. There are other > repeatable scenarios that still cause problems, and to which some large > progressive providers also see as an issue and won't accept termination becuase > of it: > > GW <- SIP -> * <- IAX2 -> * <- SIP -> 79X0 > > Now, if this scenario has been corrected as well, please accept my apologies > for bringing it up. > > This config, with the absolute latest CVS HEAD, well as of a week or so ago > when I last checked, seems to cause issues on the sequencing. > > I seem to recall comments that there is some work still being done on getting > this cross protocol packet sequencing to work properly? I'll have to get > Ethereal out again and prove that it is still happening. > > And why are we blaming Cisco for dropping packets that are mis-sequenced, when > we shouldn't be sending them mis-sequenced packets in the first place? > > Ray. > > ------------------------------------------------- > This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ > > -- > Scanned for viruses and dangerous content at > http://www.oneunified.net and is believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
