What's the story on the enhanced voicemail features ? When will they be committed ? They don't appear to be in CVS-HEAD-05/19/04.
Thanks, Chris Netlabz, Inc. ----- Original Message ----- From: "brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 12:04 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] AArgh, * and the 7960 > You can't consider CVS_HEAD dev anymore as its been allowed to stabilize in > the past month and will be 1.1 > > Bkw > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson > > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:09 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] AArgh, * and the 7960 > > > > > > We as users of lots of other service providers and systems other then > > > > Nufone don't have the choice of forcing "those" systems to either Head > > > > or Stable. That's purely irrelevant. Since we can't force others to > > > > upgrade to anything, we're stuck with either throwing away the Cisco > > > > phones or removing the rtp.c code that's causing the poor quality > > issue. > > > > > > Fine then -- fix your problem -- set up two * boxes, one talking ot the > > SIP > > > gateway and then set up an IAX-IAX or better yet TDMoE link between the > > > interim one and the one your cisco phones are connected to. > > > > > > I think the point you're trying to make is that Cisco needs to solve > > their > > > problem, and that Asterisk needs to make it happen. That isn't gonna > > work. > > > A second box with a pair of ethernet cards in it will, unless I'm > > missing > > > something. > > > > Two * boxes does not fix the problem as the timestamps will trickle > > through > > each. The root of the problem is two fold: a) iax conversations where pkts > > originate from an * system that is either older then about 30 days ago (or > > a system based on stable code), and, b) cisco 7960 issue with dropping any > > packet with uneven timestamps. > > > > If your * system has iax links to two service providers, three different > > companies (in production), and other such things, there is literally no > > way > > to convince "all" remote sites to upgrade to "dev cvs". That IS the > > problem, > > but there seems to be a major issue with a few on this list understanding > > that and understanding what "production" means. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
