John Todd wrote:
At 7:36 PM +0200 on 5/22/04, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
[snip]
Sending NOTIFY to Asterisk is an error, but a workaround. Since Asterisk
can handled the NAT traversal all by itself with Qualify (as John points
out) disabling the NOTIFY will not change anything.
The NOTIFY will in no way affect the status - unreachable/reachable.
Another problem with the SIPURA is the lack of a working STUN solution.
Even Grandstream works better with NAT today.
/O
Do you have difficulties with the Sipura SPA-2000 (or other Sipura
boxes) and Asterisk? I've found no problems, even behind NAT, though I
have only tried behind one or two NAT devices (OpenBSD and Apple Airport.)
It's surprising that Sipura doesn't include STUN as an option - their
list of options is so huge that I always assumed I had just missed it,
but now that I look closer I suppose you're right. Do Asterisk users
even really need STUN? I've never found it to be required after the NAT
issues were worked out of Asterisk...
No, no problems with a Sipura and Asterisk. The Sipura is impressive,
so I'm surprised that it doesn't support STUN and NAT in a good way,
so we could enable canreinvite=
/O
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
