> Is anyone will propose anything better then crappy mpg123 musiconhold? I > think playing wav files is better approach then playing CPU consuming > mpegs.
If you stop and realize that mpg123 will not decode when the stream isn't being used. So you are only burning CPU when someone is listening to the stream. In addition if you use mpg123 0.59r you will never have one ounce of problems with it. Download and compile that version from src (and yes the version on the website is patched but you aren't using http to stream) Also if you use "quietmp3nb" you will see only *one* mpg123 per music on hold class. I don't see one thing that's crappy about the current music on hold setup. bkw _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
