You are correct... No glare on a PRI W. Kevin Hunt
CCIE #11841 www.huntbrothers.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Critchfield Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 3:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] "Glare" condition - How well does asteriskhandle? On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 13:53, Scott Stingel wrote: > Hi- > > I have an upcoming application that requires use of PRI channels that > are primarily used for high-volume incoming traffic, but that are to > be used for outbound calling as well. Of course, one option is to > have dedicated outbound channels reserved, but this is an inefficient > use of channel resources. > > Normally PBX's are designed to have the CPE yield to an incoming call > if a particular channel is seized by both ends at the same time (a > condition known as "glare"), but I'm wondering if anyone has > real-world experience with asterisk to say how well this is handled. While I may be wrong, I don't think "glare" happens on PRI. The difference being that the call isn't sent over a channel until there had been communications on the D channel. This means a send and a receive. "Glare" would happen on a channelized T1 where it is possible for each end to try and seize the channel at the same time, since there isn't any out of band communications. -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
