Either way is good. Thank you very much for you patch, it applied cleanly, built no problem, and I'll be sure to bug the list if I have any problems with it in use.
On May 26, 2004 06:14 pm, Adam Hart wrote: > Tony Hoyle wrote: > > > Adam Hart wrote: > > > >>> > >> Forgive me for prehaps a stupid question but does the 2.6 kernel have > >> accurate timers built in now? as I see your code just wraps their timer. > >> > > The HZ value in 2.6 is now 1000 to support realtime scheduling etc. > > It's certainly accurate enough. I'm not sure the same thing would work > > on 2.4 though (maybe worth a try if someone's got some spare time...) > > > > If you run zttest with it loaded you get about 99.98% accuracy. > > > > Tony > > > > Great news then, prehaps there's a way to interface directly from user > mode so drivers ain't required at all (fallback mode if no zaptel > hardware installed) > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > -- Scott Brooks Network Operations Analyst Binary Solutions Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
