Rich Adamson wrote: > Isn't it about time to lock down added functionality to v1.1 and fix > the remaining bugs? > > There has been a significant amount of traffic on the cvs list, the > irc and other channels with folks spending time adding new > functionality to Head. Think its time to lock it down, fix the bugs > that have been introduced, and get to "something" that the _majority_ > can agree to call v1.1 Stable in real production terms. > > It's a known fact that bugs are not being fixed in Stable, and even > Mark has suggested no one should be running Stable in a production > environment. > > There has been a number of postings in the last few days relative to > bugs in sip, iax2, zaptel, codecs, etc. The add-on folks are > obviously also > having problems keeping up with modifying patches to a constantly > moving target, and applying those to Stable is fruitless. > > I'd even suggest that no v1.2 Head be created until such time as the > majority of bugs are fixed, and that souce _then_ copied to whatever > the next version is going to be called. > > All in favor? >
Me too!!! It would be though very nice to know the difference between head and stable! _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
