For those still impacted by the iax2/gsm/cisco choppy sound, please add your comments to bug #1742. The "source" of the problem tends to be the asterisk box "originating" the iax2/gsm data flows (eg, if you hear choppy audio, the * box at the distant end is the one originating inconsistent timestamps) so be sure to include * version data for both ends (if possible).
------------------------ > I'm willing to open my system up for those developers that cannot duplicate > the problem on their own systems. I have a nice flat network, good > hardware, no off-the-wall configurations, an up-to-date kernel and server > hardware, etc. Contact me on or off list and I'll arrange for SSH access > for you, after we have a short phone conversation. > > Nik Martin > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Rich Adamson > > Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 7:59 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Downgrading Asterisk > > > > > > The code changes that fixed the cisco choppy sound for Stable > > went in last Friday. That change corrected iax2 issues that > > had been known for well over a month but never got applied to > > Stable. That same code is in Head, however many other changes > > have happened to Head, and some of those apparently have > > impacted at least "some" of us (mostly cisco users). Stable > > has a number of other bugs that reportedly will never get > > fixed as the fixes use functionality that exists only in Head. > > > > It seems the choppy (and almost unusable) audio in Head is > > only impacting > > "some" cisco users, and since these problems are not > > impacting the few that can read code, use cisco phones, and > > are impacted, we're stuck with the problem. The problem seems > > to be very evasive, however switching the iax2 links to use > > only iLBC (and not gsm) has corrected issues for some. > > > > Although many of us that have worked in a production I/T > > arena assume something called Stable would truly have known > > bugs fixed, that's hardly the case for *. That branch really > > should be renamed to something like v1.0 and remove any > > reference to Stable and bug fixes as its treated as a > > lockdown for added functionality, and has nothing to do with > > functional stability. > > > > ------------------------ > > > FYI Downgrading to -stable totally fixed the choppy audio > > on Cisco my > > > 7960 > > > <- * -> IAX setup. Now, when would a fix that goes into > > stable get into the > > > current source (HEAD)? And, isn't checking stuff into a > > stable branch that > > > doesn't exist elsewhere in the source tree break some rules > > somewhere? It > > > has to. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > > Of Nik Martin > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 2:53 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Downgrading Asterisk > > > > > > > > > > > > I upgraded to the latest HEAD version of asterisk, and all > > > > IAX calls started sounding choppy. It was suggested on the > > > > IRC channel that I go back to asterisk -stable to determine > > > > if that fixes it. Is downgrading as simple as upgrading? > > > > Because now, -stable builds fine, but I get an error on the > > > > asterisk console when starting, something about "ast_get_txt" > > > > not found. Recompiling and installing asterisk HEAD > > > > afterwards works just fine. > > > > > > > > As a side note, I recently upgraded my kernel to 2.4.26 and > > > > had an issue with old kernel headers, but have since resolved > > > > that prior to trying this downgrade. > > > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > > > Nik > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > ---------------End of Original Message----------------- > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ---------------End of Original Message----------------- _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
