Chris A. Icide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 08:53 AM 6/1/2004, Kevin Walsh wrote: > > Mike Heininger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > It's a pity ... it would be great to fallback to another (free) > > > codec. > > > > > Just use a relatively-free codec (iLBC or GSM etc.) in the first > > place, and avoid G.729. That strategy works for me. :-) > > > While in some cases, just not using G729 may be a valid option, there > will ALWAYS be exceptions to that. > I must be the lucky one then, as I have found no need for G.729. :-)
If I find a supplier that only supports G.729 then I'll simply not do business with them. Giving in only encourages them. Perhaps, if enough people stopped using these closed "standards", suppliers would start to support the alternatives, and take up of VoIP would no longer be held to ransom by greedy monopolists. Just a thought. -- _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
