Darren Edmundson wrote:
I apologise if I misunderstood your aims, however surely it is infinitely better to try and get asterisk standards compliant by default (preferably before the 1.0/1.1 release) rather than resort to promoting DNS hacks to get around what should be an easy enough bug to fix.
How's it a DNS "hack" when the SRV record includes the A record????
There is a chicken-and-egg situation. If everyone uses only A-records then there will be no impetus for UAs and servers to support SRVs. If servers don't support it, then Admins will either choose to use only A records, or be forced to.
Everyone will use A records regardless... They make up part of the SRV record so either way things aren't suddenly going to break...
I remember hearing of one common windoze one which even recently, but that might have been a bulk-mailer, and I think it's probably a desirable feature that a large proportion of spam be undeliverable :)
Apparently the infected windows machines are delivering the spam directly to the email client these days...
--
Best regards, Duane
http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom http://happysnapper.com.au - Sell your photos over the net! http://e164.org - Using Enum.164 to interconnect asterisk servers
"In the confrontation between the stream and the rock, the stream always wins; not through strength, but through persistence." _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
