For me the big issue of html is in the message digests. Since the html
is mixed in with plain text browsers do not detect the html. For
individual messages HTML is generally not a problem.
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk-Users List Etiquette
From: Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:10:12 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 08:35, Rich Adamson wrote:
Isn't it odd as hell the same people that complain about html are also
some of the same people that use "special" mail readers to emulate news
readers? Both seem to want to influence the 8,000 list members their
tools are the only one's in existence and we better all format our
list postings to make their tool happy. NOT!
Guess my 1996 reader must be a little odd; it handles top & bottom postings
along with html without complaining a bit.
Most all mail readers these days support HTML email. The difference
though is when one uses a mail reader that renders the HTML and the HTML
is written by someone who has no clue how the readers machine is set up.
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
