I think I do agree with your assessment that *BSD are more stable that linux, no disrespect meant to linux as I think it is wonderful in its own right.
What version of FreeBSD ? BSD you are using ? I am looking to build an athlon 64 server soon and am wondering if FreeBSD would be a better option. Umar. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Aaron J. Angel Sent: 15 June 2004 20:17 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] ASTERISK V. SER Usedcanon wrote: > Just out of interest (as I am a freeBSD fan) why more stable on BSD ? I have no idea, it just seems to run better on *BSD. I'm still trying to investigate that myself. Perhaps I'm just inept when it comes to Linux, but it has never run decently for me -- I've always had problems with whichever distro I try. This time it seems to be the network card mostly, but then I get similar response from the console every now and then, so maybe it's not the NIC. Maybe I should have rephrased that or left it out, as it's probably not Asterisk that is more stable, technically speaking. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
