Send traces.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Aimable" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 6:28 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with PRI with T410 messages > Hi all, > I have a box running asterisk with T410 connected to a Nortel DMS 100 switch > and another box running SER with grandstream phones on it > So if there is a call from the pstn it goes from the Nortel to the asterisk > and then to the SER box and finally to the phones.if the phone is busy or > the number is invalid the * box will first send an ALERT message to the > Nortel and say the call is going on and the phone is ringing (which is not > the case )and after it will send a RELEASE message saying that the line is > busy or the # is invalid .is there any way * can send a progress message > instead of the alerting message until it gets the correct message from SER? > > > Thanks > Habiyakare Aimable > Phone Services > TERRACOM Broadband > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 10:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #4181 - 12 msgs > > Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. RE: Soekris Engineering net4801 (Senad Jordanovic) > 2. Accepting SIP calls from unregistered gateways (Axel) > 3. Re: pri with TE410P not working (Austria) (Peter Svensson) > 4. Re: ZAPHFC - only for * 0.7.2? (Holger Schurig) > 5. Calling the firefly network? (Martijn van Oosterhout) > 6. RE: IAX2 no compatible codecs (Jason Penton) > 7. Re: pri with TE410P not working (Austria) (Wolfgang Pichler) > 8. Re: embedded Asterisk (Klaus-Peter Junghanns) > 9. Re: pri with TE410P not working (Austria) (Michael Bielicki) > 10. RE: Cost of IP Phones, or Isn't It Just > Software? (Andy Powell) > 11. Re: pri with TE410P not working (Austria) (Peter Svensson) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > From: "Senad Jordanovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Soekris Engineering net4801 > Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:34:01 +0100 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > John Bittner wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have it working great. I have debian running on it with music on > > hold disabled. I setup 10 cisco 7960 phones and tested the 4801 with > > calls on all 10 phones at the same time through voicepulse with no > > issues. I ran top with all the phones running and I was only up to > > 45% cpu. Seems to run ok but I am still in the testing phase. > > Great... > Have you tried to connect a X100P or TDM400P to it? > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > From: "Axel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 03:43:12 -0400 > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Accepting SIP calls from unregistered gateways > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_0351_01C4541D.36B45830 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hi, > Is there a way to accept SIP calls from unregistered gateways? > autocreatpeer=3Dyes seems to disable checking credentials but the = > originating gateway is still required to register itself with a username = > and password (which can be anything since it won't check it). > I like to be able to receive the call from any gateway without them = > having to register even, just like a Cisco gateway that you can = > terminate a call from clients who are not registered. Is such thing = > possible with Asterisk? > > Best regards, > > Axel > > ------=_NextPart_000_0351_01C4541D.36B45830 > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> > <HTML><HEAD> > <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = > charset=3Diso-8859-1"> > <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR> > <STYLE></STYLE> > </HEAD> > <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi,</FONT></DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Is there a way to accept SIP calls from = > > unregistered gateways?</FONT></DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>autocreatpeer=3Dyes seems to disable = > checking=20 > credentials but the originating gateway is still required to register = > itself=20 > with a username and password (which can be anything since it won't check = > > it).</FONT></DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I like to be able to receive the call = > from any=20 > gateway without them having to register even, just like a Cisco gateway = > that you=20 > can terminate a call from clients who are not registered. Is such = > thing=20 > possible with Asterisk?</FONT></DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Best regards,</FONT></DIV> > <DIV> </DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Axel<BR></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> > > ------=_NextPart_000_0351_01C4541D.36B45830-- > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:43:37 +0200 (CEST) > From: Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Asterisk-Users Mailinglist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] pri with TE410P not working (Austria) > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Wolfgang Pichler wrote: > > > ... on the card i can see the two leds pulsing red (i think thats the > > yellow alaram - or i am wrong) ? > > Are you sure it is not a red alarm? That would indicate a loss of link. > I think you can check with the command zttool. > > Are you sure the cables are correct? > Have you set the jumpers on the card to E1 and not left them on T1? > > I think the leds should turn green when the card senses a correct carrier > and framing on the lines. > > Peter > -- > Peter Svensson ! Pgp key available by finger, fingerprint: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ! 8A E9 20 98 C1 FF 43 E3 07 FD B9 0A 80 72 70 AF > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Remember, Luke, your source will be with you... always... > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 4 > From: Holger Schurig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ZAPHFC - only for * 0.7.2? > Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:59:33 +0200 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I've got Zaphfc working running Asterisk v. 0.7.2 > > > > Then I have tried with Asterisk V. 1.0 and the latest from CVS - with > > no succes. Has anybody got zaphfc working with newer version than 0.7.2 > > zaphfc is in bri-stuff from www.junghanns.net --- or in a patched version > at http://capi4linux.thepenguin.de/download/asterisk/. I downloaded the > latter and let the ./download.sh and ./compile.sh scripts run normally. > > Then I install zaptel.o and zaphfc.o to /lib/modules/<kernelversion>/misc > and do the usual mambo in /etc/modules to run ztcfg after loading zaphfc > and to load zaptel before zaphfc: > > pre-install zaphfc /sbin/modprobe zaptel > post-install zaphfc /sbin/ztcfg -v > > Now I go to a different directory and do a CVS checkout of Asterisk head. > Just before compiling, I replace channels/chan_zap.c with > bri-stuff-0.0.2a-pp/asterisk/channels/chan.zap.c. > > I then change the lines of the form > > static ast_mutex_t usecnt_lock = AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; > > into > > AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC(usecnt_lock); > > and compile & install. And voila, now I have an Asterisk from (almost) CVS > HEAD working with zaphfc. > > > > > The real solution would have been to apply all the patches from > bri-stuff*/libpri.patch to libpri in CVS. After looking at how much has > been changed and considering that I don't have a clue about q.921 and > q.931 I decided to not doing it that way :-) > > Also, I'd thing it would be better if KaPeJot put's his software into some > CVS so that more than one person can add changes and keep things > up-to-date. > > Greetings, Holger > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:12:10 +1000 > From: Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Calling the firefly network? > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Is there a way to register with or call the firefly network from an Asterisk > server. It would be pretty cool if you could gateway calls onto it. > > Have a nice day, > -- > Martijn van Oosterhout > > --__--__-- > > Message: 6 > From: "Jason Penton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 no compatible codecs > Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 10:22:10 +0200 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi Adam > > Thanks - Here are the two attempts: > > This is the first one where * dials firefly via the dialplan (which works > fine): > > Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW > Timestamp: 00001ms SCall: 00004 DCall: 00000 [146.231.125.65:4569] > VERSION : 2 > CALLED NUMBER : s > CALLING NUMBER : 7001 > CALLING NAME : Alfredo+Terzoli > LANGUAGE : en > FORMAT : 4 > CAPABILITY : 2147483647 > ADSICPE : 2 > DATE TIME : 147935435 > > Now the following output is when I use the manager ORIGINATE command: > > Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW > Timestamp: 00001ms SCall: 00004 DCall: 00000 [146.231.125.65:4569] > VERSION : 2 > CALLED NUMBER : s > LANGUAGE : en > FORMAT : 64 > CAPABILITY : 2147483647 > ADSICPE : 0 > DATE TIME : 147935484 > > > Jun 17 10:07:57 WARNING[180236]: chan_iax2.c:4534 socket_read: Call rejected > by 146.231.125.65: No compatible Codecs > > > I can see the inconsitency with the FORMAT header of the two setup messages. > According to the IAX protocol spec. The FORMAT (0x4) represents G.711 U-LAW, > which is exactly what the resulting call uses. However, the funny thing is > that the protocol spec has no entry for FORMAT(0x64) in the second message - > an undefined format. The quesiton is how the * manager API causes * to > inititiate an IAX call with this FORMAT type (0x64)??????? An how we can fix > it ???????. > > Any ideas, anyone > Thanks again Adam for the help > Cheers > Jason > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Hart > > Sent: 17 June 2004 09:19 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 no compatible codecs > > > > iax2 debug is your friend, looks at the capibilities asterisk > > is sending > > in it's NEW message > > > > Jason Penton wrote: > > > > > Hi Adam > > > > > > Done all that but still the same problem. > > > > > > Do you have any other ideas? > > > > > > Cheers > > > Jason > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Adam Hart > > >>Sent: 17 June 2004 08:29 AM > > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 no compatible codecs > > >> > > >>check under your network settings that you have all the > > >>codecs selected > > >>and obviously type IAX > > >> > > >>Jason Penton wrote: > > >> > > >>>Hi All > > >>> > > >>>I have a strange problem using IAX2. When placing a call to > > >> > > >>my IAX clients > > >> > > >>>(firefly) via the Asterisk dialplan all works great. > > >> > > >>However trying to > > >> > > >>>initiate a call via the manager interface to the IAX client > > >> > > >>using the > > >> > > >>>following command results in an error: > > >>> > > >>>Action: Originate > > >>>Channel: IAX2/7000 > > >>>Extension: 7000 > > >>>Context: local > > >>>Priority: 1 > > >>>ActionID: 1 > > >>> > > >>>The error I get in the CLI is "Jun 17 08:18:36 WARNING[180236]: > > >>>chan_iax2.c:4534 socket_read: Call rejected by #IP: No > > >> > > >>compatible Codecs" > > >> > > >>>Does anyone have any ideas. > > >>> > > >>>Thanks in advance > > >>>Jason > > >>> > > >>>_______________________________________________ > > >>>Asterisk-Users mailing list > > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > >>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > >>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > >>> > > >> > > >>_______________________________________________ > > >>Asterisk-Users mailing list > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > >>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 7 > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] pri with TE410P not working (Austria) > From: Wolfgang Pichler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Asterisk-Users Mailinglist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 10:28:09 +0200 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Am Do, den 17.06.2004 schrieb Peter Svensson um 9:43: > > On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Wolfgang Pichler wrote: > > > > > ... on the card i can see the two leds pulsing red (i think thats the > > > yellow alaram - or i am wrong) ? > > > > Are you sure it is not a red alarm? That would indicate a loss of link. > > I think you can check with the command zttool. > you are right - its a red alarm - zttool says "Red Alarm/Not Open" > > > > Are you sure the cables are correct? > > Have you set the jumpers on the card to E1 and not left them on T1? > The jumpers are on E1 - the cables should be ok (they are working with > other hardware) - and the card is directly connected to a simens ULAF+ > STU Desktop (can't really find much information about this device on the > net) - which turns off a red led when i load the driver and do a ztcfg. > > > > I think the leds should turn green when the card senses a correct carrier > > and framing on the lines. > green is always a wounderful color ;-) > > so, what else could cause this ? > > wolfgang > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 8 > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] embedded Asterisk > From: Klaus-Peter Junghanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Organization: Junghanns.NET GmbH > Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 10:11:11 +0200 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi, > > > Actually, you the Geode CPU mentioned below is a 5x86 (486 platform) at > > 233 MHz. If you take Pebble (http://www.nycwireless.net/pebble/), which > > is a downstripped Debian (< 64 MB) on a readonly ext2 filesystem, you > > should be grand. Installing asterisk + some extra stuff will probably > > require, that you have at least a 128MB or 256MB flash or so. > > Dont go for "stripped down but complete" distributions which include a > lot of stuff that you dont need, e.g. gcc. Go for a rescue system, like > i used the SuSE rescue system (14 mb), then you can add what you need > (sshd,...) and compile asterisk on another box and then just copy it. > My compressed ramdisk image is 32 mb, including all voice prompts and > some mp3s for MOH. > > > > > There are actually quite some board around on that CPU, like Soekris, > > pcengines and i think also Mikrotik at prices from 120EUR and up. > > > I just put together the demo system for Linuxtag: > - Via EPIA 5000 (C3-533), EUR 80,- > - Morex case with external power supply, EUR 80,- > - some old 256 mb SDRAMM > - 128 MB USB memory stick, EUR 30,- > - 1 quadBRI (could also easily handle an octoBRI, or a PRI card, > with the dual riser pci card you can use 2 cards) > > The C3-533 is an i586 CPU. According to "show translation" it needs > 30 ms for transcoding 1 channel from g711 to gsm (and vice versa). > So, neglecting any overhead caused by channel handling it could > transcode 30 channels to gsm. > > Linux BIOS has support for the EPIA boards, so you can speed up booting > very much and also disable the VGA port (very useful for production > deployments....). > > > I'm running pebble on a pcengines board, just needed to customize the > > kernel a bit, haven't been testing asterisk on that yet, but i definatly > > will in the sooner future. > > > > Kind regards, > > Martin List-Petersen > > martin (at) list (dash) petersen (dot) net > > best regards > > Klaus > -- > Klaus-Peter Junghanns > > CEO, CTO > Junghanns.NET GmbH > Breite Strasse 13a - 12167 Berlin - Germany > fon: (de) +49 30 79705390 > fon: (uk) +44 870 1244692 > fax: (de) +49 30 79705391 > iaxtel: 1-700-157-8753 > http://www.Junghanns.NET/asterisk/ > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 9 > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] pri with TE410P not working (Austria) > From: Michael Bielicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Organization: TAAN Consultants Ltd. > Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 10:32:41 +0200 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > What is in your config file ? > zaptel.conf ? > also, check the crc4 settings > and > maybe the wire you are using is wrong since some equippment needs > crossed wires, some needs straight wires. Crossed would be 1-4 2-5 > > cheers > > Michael > > On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 10:28, Wolfgang Pichler wrote: > > Am Do, den 17.06.2004 schrieb Peter Svensson um 9:43: > > > On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Wolfgang Pichler wrote: > > > > > > > ... on the card i can see the two leds pulsing red (i think thats the > > > > yellow alaram - or i am wrong) ? > > > > > > Are you sure it is not a red alarm? That would indicate a loss of link. > > > I think you can check with the command zttool. > > you are right - its a red alarm - zttool says "Red Alarm/Not Open" > > > > > > Are you sure the cables are correct? > > > Have you set the jumpers on the card to E1 and not left them on T1? > > The jumpers are on E1 - the cables should be ok (they are working with > > other hardware) - and the card is directly connected to a simens ULAF+ > > STU Desktop (can't really find much information about this device on the > > net) - which turns off a red led when i load the driver and do a ztcfg. > > > > > > I think the leds should turn green when the card senses a correct > carrier > > > and framing on the lines. > > green is always a wounderful color ;-) > > > > so, what else could cause this ? > > > > wolfgang > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 10 > Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 10:33:52 +0200 > From: "Andy Powell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Cost of IP Phones, or Isn't It Just > Software? > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On 16/06/2004 at 22:53 Jay Milk wrote: > > >You're correct -- I believe I pointed out in my original post that there > >is a $200+ difference between a cordless Cisco with/without software. > >And that's plain ridiculous. Plus, the phone alone isn't worth $500 in > >hardware -- so we're obviously dealing with GREED here. > > > >My knee-jerk response to such business tactics always has been to do it > >better and cheaper. Six years ago, I was talking to IT personel in > >industry "X". There were two established mainframe solutions in that > >industry serving 80% of the market, costing $50K-$75K start-up cost per > >location, plus $1K+ per seat. Never mind the $10K-$15K monthly > >"maintenance" cost. Never mind that everyone had to be able to work a > >terminal with a lovely amber on black, text-based "GUI". > > > <snip for brevity> > > I think you're missing the point. When you develop hardware or software you > need to recoup the cost of development (the period in which you aren't= > selling > anything, so not making any money). Now Cisco has it's fingers in many pies > so they aren't going to suffer to much from that now, but they do have to= > fund > development. > > Secondly, Cisco don't really care if their phones are out of your price= > range, > they are typically sold as part of a solution costing 10's of 1000's or= > 100's of > 1000's of USD/GBP/EUR and (most probably) with big discounts. > > Thirdly, If I make a device at a cost of $5 and sell it for $500, some= > people will > buy it, up to the point where someone builds a similar device and sells it= > for > $150 ...You have a choice. companies are not charities, they do this to= > make > money. This is what we call capitalism. > > I don't want to dig at your business, and this isn't intended to but.. what= > you did > is look at what was already on offer and it's costs, how it worked etc and= > built a > cheaper solution. The reason you could do this is because you had the= > exposure > to the 'system' as was.. i.e. You looked at it and said 'I can do that= > cheaper' but > without that original system you probably wouldn't have. > > One final point... There are some companies that have this weird feeling= > that anything > under a certain amount must be cheap and nasty and not work properly. These= > people > are fools imho, but they do exist...and they wont buy an cheap phone,= > they'll buy an > expensive phone, regardless of it's ability... as we've seen recently some= > governments > will even buy helicopters that can't fly in fog or where it's sandy for= > silly money... > > Now I feel dirty... > > > Andy > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 11 > Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 10:38:30 +0200 (CEST) > From: Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Asterisk-Users Mailinglist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] pri with TE410P not working (Austria) > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Wolfgang Pichler wrote: > > > > Are you sure the cables are correct? > > > Have you set the jumpers on the card to E1 and not left them on T1? > > The jumpers are on E1 - the cables should be ok (they are working with > > other hardware) - and the card is directly connected to a simens ULAF+ > > STU Desktop (can't really find much information about this device on the > > net) - which turns off a red led when i load the driver and do a ztcfg. > > Then the tx (from TE410P to the Siemens equipment) circuit is ok but the > rx may not be. > > > > I think the leds should turn green when the card senses a correct > carrier > > > and framing on the lines. > > green is always a wounderful color ;-) > > > > so, what else could cause this ? > > I'd try to find out if the cable is wired the way the TE410P expects it to > be. Do you know the pinout of both ends of the cables? RX (from the TE410P > point of view) should be on the pins 1-2 at the TE410P end and TX on 4-5. > > Peter > -- > Peter Svensson ! Pgp key available by finger, fingerprint: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ! 8A E9 20 98 C1 FF 43 E3 07 FD B9 0A 80 72 70 AF > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Remember, Luke, your source will be with you... always... > > > > > > --__--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > End of Asterisk-Users Digest > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
