On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:11:10 -0700, Randy Bush wrote: >i am looking at iax to see if it is applicable to my needs. i >would appreciate any corrections of what i think i have understood >but probably have not. > >iax uses udp and traverses nats. neither of these seems useful to >me. i loathe nats, and udp is not well-behaved in the sense of >congestion avoidance.
>trunking will save some bytes in flight iff one has four or more >streams moving between two pbxes. but who would want to have the >pbxes in the data stream anyway? reinvite rules, especially in a >geographically distributed use scenario. If you are using an IP/AIX based termination provider then trunking makes great sense. Even in my situation with only a handlful of desktops I see enough activity to know that I'm saving bandwidth with trunking to my termination provider. Michael >now, i could see a network of iaxen if there was some way to >negotiate call routing with costs etc. but trip looks a bit ugly >and kinda far away. and it certainly is not part of current play. > >what am i missing here? > >randy > >_______________________________________________ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > -- Michael Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com Pixel Power Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] o713-861-4005 o800-905-6412 c713-201-1262 "It's the end of the world as we know it. I feel Fine." - R.E.M. ** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704 _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
