It's correct that neither the SRV lookup is handled correctly or completely, nore is there in standard distro a way to register with the proxy for a domain, if those names differ.
It wasn't a difficult task to change this.
If there is interest I might release the patch for this as part of another development.


The syntax I implemented was this:
register => user[:secret[:authname[:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@proxyhost[:port][/contact]


Would this fit your needs?
Or any other ideas?

There is also the option of expanding, or better redesigning, the [peer] sections with proper and logical configuration options
and adding a register=yes flag.
Both have been tried, and have their pro's and con's
Any thoughts?






Senad Jordanovic wrote:

Jasminko Mulahusic wrote:


This issued has been discussed few weeks ago into great depth. Look
into May/June 04 archive!


i have indeed looked into archives (wiki, googled using tabs, asked my
barber) and what have been discussed were SRV records for outgoing
calls.


the same seems not to work for REGISTER.



Well, I have not followed that thread into great details but my understanding is that * does not support SRV records properly! If you find a concrete answer I would be interested to know about it!

BTW...
Jasko, gdje se ti nalazis/radis?

Ta
Senad


_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to