Wolfgang S. Rupprecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rich Adamson) writes: > > Like *, it also has an internal dialplan, however understanding the > > various interactions requires some experimentation, as each of the > > interfaces seem to be considered a "gateway", and part of the dialplan > > directs calls to gw0, gw1, gw2 (etc) which correspond to physical > > interfaces in most cases. > > > I felt some pangs of guilt turning all that stuff off, but I couldn't > think of any time I'd want two dialplans in series. > It saves having to wait for an inter-digit timeout to expire when dialling via the FXS port. The SPA-[123]000 dialplan will recognise your dial string and send it immediately to Asterisk (if so configured). Asterisk will take it from there.
You can apparently use the SPA-3000 dialplan to specify that the call should go via its FXO port, without going via Asterisk. This could be useful for emergency services. I don't have a SPA-3000 yet, so I can't say what happens if you try to route an emergency call via the FXO port and that port is in use. Perhaps it sends the call to Asterisk instead. I'll find out when I get mine and play with it. -- _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
