This appears to have been the magic bullet for me. Thank you very much.
So, the bottom line is that there is a bug that ends up making inbound calls use type=peer rather than type=user. Correct? > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cheng > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 8:35 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iconnect inbound - so do we > know how to fix it > > All, > > This is related to the following bug reports: > > http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002024 > http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002017 > > This is not an iConnect specific problem, but a chan_sip > change. As it turns out, type=user does not seem to work in > the latest CVS (since > June) for authentication against inbound--at least not in the > way the documentation describes. > > What we have resorted to in our offices is have two type=peer > contexts in sip.conf defined, the first being outbound, the > second being inbound. > > Believe it or not, the order of these peers matters as > chan_sip appears to take the LAST defined context as the > authentication peer if you have a static host or dns name in > the host= field. > > So, to summarize: > > 1) chan_sip.c has changed recently the authentication against > type=peer and type=user > 2) Registration statements that used to work now need to have > a matching peer in sip.conf, however, the documentation > states that chan_sip will first match type=user and if none > is found type=peer. In real life testing with CVS-HEAD from > August 4, this did not work. > 3) What did work is creating an outbound peer with the > authentication information such as username, secret, etc. > (same as before) and a separate inbound peer with just the > context,type=peer, host=, and any other codec preferences etc > for the inbound leg. > 4) This inbound peer has to be AFTER the outbound context > otherwise, chan_sip will authenticate against the outbound > peer instead of the inbound peer. > 5) NOTE that the syntax of the registration statement has > changed slightly as well (see wiki) and may need to be modified. > > On Aug 9, 2004, at 8:57 PM, Sathya Weerasooriya wrote: > > > Raj, yes your post helped me. > > > > Just to complete the whole thing and clarify the problem that was > > > > posted by Greg Blakely; > > > >> First, if there is no outbound iconnect section in sip.conf, my > >> incoming > > calls work fine (as long as my "register" > >> statements exist in the top section). > > > >> But, when I add an outbound section, using either 'peer' > or 'friend,' > >> my > > incoming calls begin to fail again with the '407 > >> Proxy Authentication' error. > > > > When there is a context created in SIP.CONF for iconnect > outgoing, we > > should point it correctly to extensions.conf. Reason is now the > > incoming too land in this context. > > > > Thanks > > > > Sathya > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Raj > >> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 5:29 AM > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iconnect inbound - so do we > know how to > >> fix it > >> > >> > >> May be you can find the solution in my post: > >> > >> http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-August/ > >> 058014.html > >> > >> Raj > >> > >> --- Vladyslav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> Try to comment out in your sip.conf > >>> ;qualify=yes > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 06:52, Sathya Weerasooriya wrote: > >>>> Just wondering whether we have a resolution to iconnect incoming > >>>> problem, which started few days ago. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers > >>>> SW > >>> -- > >>> Best regards > >>> Vlad > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Asterisk-Users mailing list > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > >>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> __________________________________ > >> Do you Yahoo!? > >> New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! > >> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users