Chris Shaw wrote:
That is a matter of opinion and not in any way factual.... SQL, just as
everything else, is as secure as YOU make it... As you said, it's a language
for querying relational databases, it has no knowledge of security. That's
what firewalls, encryption and strong passwords are for...

However, for the purpose of blocking numbers based on a do-not-call list, it
will work perfectly fine. It's lightweight, fast and relatively efficient...


If "less than a second" implies "best part of a second", then
that's a bit slow, although probably still good enough for this
application. (But I personally avoid MySQL for security reasons.)

how is SQL insecure?

SQL itself is just a standard for querying relational databases, and does not in itself specify or require security, nor does it have inherent security problems.

MySQL is a toy database that mostly ignores all but the most
superficial of the SQL standard and has a large catalogue of
bugs and misfeatures that can cause silent data corruption.

not getting into all the requirements placed on the 'downloader' of the national do not call lists, nor the COST...

it is simple, heck pretty sure i wrote an agi for it over a year ago. (or at least the initial concept code) i'll see if i can find it.

side note: a second is a second is a second... if you don't have to run it, don't... so have some gotoif code that includes the ndnc check only for that client.


_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to