On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Steve Hanselman wrote: > I agree with this, a system that has x bugs still has x bugs even if you > close them, I think they should be closed by houskeeping if they can't be > reproduced and the person that reported them can't provide a way to > replicate, but they shouldn't be closed because nobody has fixed them for a > while. > > This seems to be the case on a number of entries.
Perhaps the trigger-happiness is related to the upcoming 1.0 release? If this is the case (pure speculation) perhaps a new state "closed pending 1.0" for bugs that will not be addressed until after 1.0 can be added? Peter _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
