Meaning Asterisk won't/can't take advantage of the four CPU's? Or it's overkill for this scenario?
-----Original Message----- From: joachim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 12:52 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SMP Performance Send me the quad and i'll send you a 200$ pc to do this job. The quad is heavily overpowered. Joachim. At 22:00 24/08/2004, you wrote: >content-class: urn:content-classes:message >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C48A15.130BF232" > >We're looking at implementing Asterisk in our department in the near >future, we're looking at anywhere from 15-25 extensions. The machine we >were looking at running this on was a Quad Xeon 450mhz (2MB L2 Cache) w/ >1GB of ram. I've heard bad things about running Asterisk on SMP machines? >Would we be running into any performance issues with this machine? > >Tim Jackson >Network Engineer >Angelina County, Texas >(936)639-4827 office >(936)414-6723 mobile > >_______________________________________________ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
