Amazing,
We are talking about CURRENT CVS CODE chan_phone the way it DOES work,
not zap, not anything else, not the way it SHOULD work.

CHAN_PHONE scans the ENTIRE dial plan on EVERY digit dialed
in dialtone mode and what you describe does not work for chan_phone.
Why is it so hard to accept the facts?




Brian West wrote:

No, newer code does exactly how I described it.  Specific matches in the
current context override wildcards in any included context.  I have tested
this and that's how Mark himself says it works.  This is how it should work
if I understand it correctly and I usually do, ast_matchmore_extension is

Sorry to ruin your theory.


what makes that possible.   I don't have any zap hooked up to double check
this.   Jeremy did that in chan_skinny so it may very well be the channel
driver at fault.

bkw



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karl Brose
Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004 4:33 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Wildcards and variable number of digits


No Brian, The old driver scans the ENTIRE dial plan on EVERY digit dialed so no matter where, if you have a "." wildcard in the plan, it will match always on the first digit dialed. It is the driver that does this. If you use a SIP phone, or any technology that presents a complete dial string, then you are correct with your examples.





_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to