Steve,
Correct me if I'm wrong, T.38 can be implemented with or without TCP. I suspect these units only support T.38 over UDP, just like Cisco gateways (see http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122t/122t11/faxapp/t38.htm).
In an ideal world, all fax relay should use TCP. I think Azacall 200 supports T.38 over TCP, because it requires a separate port to be configured for T.38. I don't happen to have 2 azacalls to test. Anyone has the last word?
Cheers, Leo
Steve Underwood wrote:
Hi,
T.38 should be completely insensitive to the number of hops. That is its whole reason for existing. It sounds like these units are not using T.38.
Regards, Steve
Leo Ann Boon wrote:
Try welltech 3502 (2-port) or 3504A (4-port). beware it only works if your 2 endpoints are not too many hops apart.
Elman Efendiyev wrote:
Hello,
Could anybody suggest cheap FXO/FXS devices with full T.38 support over SIP? I found a number of devives with declared H323/SIP and T.38 support but some of them supports T.38 only with H323, others have buggy T.38
-- Sincerely, Elman Efendiyev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
