Think there has been sufficient experience in the last few months that suggest the system motherboard construction (eg, interrupt latency, pci latency, etc) has been a much later issue then processor speed. Sure wish we could truly get to the bottom of this.
------------------------ > Just a comment here. > > I built an * pbx on a Celeron 1.4ghz machine. Got all the dialplan and such > working , then built a new server with an AMD 2.4g processor with a 500mhz > front side buss. With the same Digium TDM cards and all analog incoming and > outgoing. > > The celeron was not ringing out until the third incoming ring. The new > server starts ringing inside just before the second ring hits the incoming > analog port. Same version of * and same version of Suse Linux, better > processer, better buss speed, and now a serial ata hard drive. So the speed > of the server does also have some effect. > > Lyle > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Adam Goryachev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 5:30 AM > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Caller id and the number of rings > > > > On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 13:43, HengWee Chin wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I have the following setup > > > PSTN -> ASTERISK -> IVR (using dialogic card) > > > > > > 1) Caller id information is presented to asterisk during the first and > > > second ring. > > > 2) Hence, Asterisk waits for 2 rings before pickup the call and > forwarding > > > to the appropriate FXS port. > > > 3) The IVR application also waits for 2 rings before picking up the call > to > > > get the caller id. > > > 4) Hence any caller calling to the IVR will have to wait for 4 rings > before > > > he is serviced. This is too long. > > > 5) Anyone have any idea how can I reduced the number of rings and still > have > > > caller id available to IVR? > > > > AFAIK, if asterisk has already waited 2 rings for the callerid, then why > > would the IVR need to wait as well? You shouldn't need to wait in the > > dialplan as well. Try removing that, and you should still have callerid. > > > > > 6) If I were to switch PRI ISDN, would I still have the same problem? > > > > Yup, we use an E1, and can answer immediately (no rings at all) and > > still have callerid. This is ultimately the best solution, regardless of > > your application. The only time you don't use it, is if you can't afford > > it. AFAICT, the second best solution is to use chan_capi/zaphfc with > > supported BRI cards. > > > > Just my 0.02c worth > > > > Regards, > > Adam > > > > -- > > -- > > Adam Goryachev _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
