Look at bugs.digium.com, I don't rmember the bugreport number.
-Alfred.
Kris Boutilier wrote:
I have a PRI link up and running between Asterisk and a Nortel Norstar MICS v4.1 . I'm having a problem getting the textual Caller Name across the link from Ast to Ns, however numeric Caller ID arrives and displays fine. From Ns to Ast both elements come through fine. I'm forcing dummy values for testing using:
exten => s,1,SetCIDName(Test) exten => s,2,SetCallerID(1234561234) exten => s,3,Dial(zap/g1/${ARG1},15)
I've tried switchtype=national and dms100 (adjusting accordingly on Ns) with no change. zapata.conf is currently:
; Norstar #2 (Wharf Road) context=in-t1nstar group=1 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no usecallingpres=no switchtype=dms100 pridialplan=local signalling=pri_net channel => 1-23
The SETUP frame from Ast contains:
Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=40capability: Speech (0)
Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 2/0x2) (Originator)
Message type: SETUP (5)
[04 03 80 90 a2]
Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Q.931 Std: 0 Info transfer
Ext: 1 Trans mode/rate: 64kbps, circuit-mode(16)
Ext: 1 User information layer 1: u-Law (34)Dchan: 0
[18 03 a1 83 81]
Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit, PRI Spare: 0, Preferred
ChanSel: Reserved3
Ext: 1 Coding: 0 Number Specified Channel Type:
Ext: 1 Channel: 1 ]0 Location: User (0)
[1e 02 80 83]
Progress Indicator (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0:
Ext: 1 Progress Description: Callingequipment is non-ISDN. (3) ]
[6c 0c 21 80 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34]ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1)
Calling Number (len=14) [ Ext: 0 TON: National Number (2) NPI:
Presentation: Presentation permitted, usernumber not screened (0) '1234561234' ]
[70 05 c1 36 31 30 31]
Called Number (len= 7) [ Ext: 1 TON: Subscriber Number (4) NPI:
ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) '6101' ]
Which doesn't seem to even contain the CIDName... On the other hand, the SETUP frame from the Ns contains:
< Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=56 < Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 1/0x1) (Originator) < Message type: SETUP (5) < [04 03 80 90 a2] < Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Q.931 Std: 0 Info transfer capability: Speech (0) < Ext: 1 Trans mode/rate: 64kbps, circuit-mode (16) < Ext: 1 User information layer 1: u-Law (34) < [18 03 a1 83 97] < Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit, PRI Spare: 0, Preferred Dchan: 0 < ChanSel: Reserved < Ext: 1 Coding: 0 Number Specified Channel Type: 3 < Ext: 1 Channel: 23 ] < [28 0b b1 53 43 52 44 20 4b 72 69 73 42] < Display (len=11) Charset: 31 [ SCRD KrisB ] < [6c 0c 21 80 36 30 34 38 38 35 36 38 30 38] < Calling Number (len=14) [ Ext: 0 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) < Presentation: Presentation permitted, user number not screened (0) '6048856808' ] < [70 0c 80 39 36 30 34 38 38 35 36 38 30 38] < Called Number (len=14) [ Ext: 1 TON: Unknown Number Type (0) NPI: Unknown Number Plan (0) '96048856808' ]
Which has the textual ID in the 'Display' element... However I understand from http://resource.intel.com/telecom/support/tnotes/tnbyos/2000/tn033.htm that there is no definitive standard for transmitting the name.
So, should even I be expecting Ast to put the name on the wire when it's
originating?
Kris Boutilier Information Systems Coordinator Sunshine Coast Regional District
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
