This begs the question, again, that someone else posted originally.. what about loading SPA-2000 or PAP2-NA firmware in the PAP2? If it's the same hardware, there shouldn't be any reason not to try it.
Ryan Wilkins On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Brandon Patterson (peering) wrote: > This is about big business. No ILEC is going to just sit idle and watch > billions in revenue go out the window. It will be interesting to see if port > blocking ever becomes an issue. Did I buy my Internet service with out > without restrictions? Hmmmm. Cisco sells to Telco's and Cable guys. Vonage > has serious $ so I would expect serious business moves on their part. There > is no way the excuse you were given is true. The real reason? Vonage > probably went nuts and told Cisco to fix the problem. I know I would, how > about the rest of you? There are other providers of hardware starting to > gear up for mass production of terminal adapters. It will all happen before > the end of the year. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
